IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 17.38
Issues In Possession Of Hypodermic Syringe Or Needle
To susta
in the charge of possession of [(a hypodermic syringe) (a hypodermic needle)
(any instrument adapted for the use of a controlled substance or cannabis by subcutaneous
injection)], the State must prove the following proposition:
That the defendan t knowingly had in his possession [(a hypodermic syringe) (a
hypodermic needle) (any instrument adapted for the use of a controlled substance or cannabis by
subcutaneous injection)]
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that this proposition has been
proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all of the evidence that this proposition has not
been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Committ
ee Note
720 ILCS
635/1 (West, 1999) (formerly Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 38, §22-50).
Give I
nstruction 17.37.
Note tha
t Sections 635/1 and 635/5 contain exceptions.
Use appl
icable bracketed material.
When acc
ountability is an issue, ordinarily insert the phrase “or one for whose conduct he
is legally responsible” after the word “defendant” in each proposition. See Instruction 5.03.
_____________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-10
- Edition
- 2026-09-10
- Content hash
97fc584053eba7893efc46db06b123618a6628c46efb3e0ef62882e43a27902f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.