IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 17.31
Definition Of Criminal Drug Conspiracy
A person
commits the offense of criminal drug conspiracy when he, with the intent that
the offense of ____ be committed, agrees with [(another) (others)] to the commission of the
offense of ____, and an act in furtherance of the agreement is performed by any party to the
agreement.
To constitute the offense of criminal drug conspiracy it is not necessary that the
conspirators succeed in committing the offense of ____.
Committ
ee Note
720 ILCS
570/405.1 (West, 1999) (formerly Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 561/2, §1405.1), added by
P.A. 86-809, effective January 1, 1990.
The court
must also give an instruction that defines the drug offense that is the alleged
subject of the criminal drug conspiracy. See Committee Notes to that drug definition instruction
and to Instruction 6.03 generally regarding conspiracy principles.
P.A. 86- 809 is
worded in general conspiracy language from 720 ILCS 5/8- 2, but it is
limited to agreements to commit a violation of 720 ILCS 570/401, 570/402, or 570/407.
See Co
mmittee Note to Instruction 17.05A if delivery is an issue.
See I
nstruction 17.13A, regarding the word “agreement.”
Insert
in the blanks the name of the offense that is the subject of the alleged criminal drug
conspiracy.
Use appl
icable bracketed material.
_____________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-10
- Edition
- 2026-09-10
- Content hash
3a50e05bd8e94280e881e028429c8f2e12be36c7cb7a445199c5fd5ed3a8326a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.