IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 17.25
Definition Of Delivery Of Controlled Substance--Enhancing Factors Based Upon Pregnant
Woman Recipient
A person c
ommits the offense of delivery of a controlled substance to a pregnant woman
when he knowingly delivers a substance containing a controlled substance to a woman he knows
to be pregnant [and the substance containing the controlled substance weighs [(____ grams or
more) (____ grams or more but less than ____ grams)]].
Committ
ee Note
720 ILCS 570/
407.2 (West, 1999) (formerly Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 561/2, §1407.2), added by
P.A. 86-1459, effective January 1, 1991.
Give I
nstruction 17.26.
When deli
very of more than the statutory minimum of a substance is charged, weight
then determines the penalty for the offense and is an essential element to be decided by the jury.
See People v. Kadlec, 21 Ill.App.3d 289, 313 N.E.2d 522 (3d Dist.1974); People v. Hill, 169
Ill.App.3d 901, 524 N.E.2d 604, 120 Ill.Dec. 574 (1st Dist.1988). When the jury must decide this
issue, use the bracketed material in this instruction and use all three propositions in Instruction
17.26.
Parti
cular care must be taken when disputes about weight support lesser included
offenses. See example in the Committee Note to Instruction 17.01 and People v. Smith, 67
Ill.App.3d 952, 385 N.E.2d 707, 24 Ill.Dec. 566 (5th Dist.1978).
When the pr
osecution must prove the quantity of the substance as an element of the
offense, it need not prove that the defendant knew the quantity was of an y specific amount. See
People v. Cortez, 77 Ill.App.3d 448, 395 N.E.2d 1177, 32 Ill.Dec. 796 (1st Dist.1979); People v.
Ziehm, 120 Ill.App.3d 777, 458 N.E.2d 588, 76 Ill.Dec. 188 (2d Dist.1983).
Although t
he quantity may not always be required in the verdict forms, People v. Roy,
172 Ill.App.3d 16, 526 N.E.2d 204, 122 Ill.Dec. 64 (4th Dist.1988), to insure clarity the
Committee recommends that each verdict form contain the same quantity language used in the
definitional and issues instructions supporting the verdict.
It should not
be necessary in most delivery cases to add the phrase “... but less than ____
grams.” Only when a lesser included offense instruction based upon weight is given are the
statutory upper limits provided in Section 570/401 an issue in the case.
Although S
ection 570/407.2 incorporates by reference violations of Section 570/401, by
its own specific language it is limited to acts of delivery and not other acts proscribed by the
predicate section, and it is limited to controlled substances and not counterfeit substances.
See Com
mittee Note to Instruction 17.19, regarding inconsistent amendments to the
predicate offense, Section 570/401.
See Com
mittee Note to Instruction 17.01 concerning verdict forms and for directions on
_____________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
how the jury should be instructed when the weight of the substance is an issue.
If other
terms used in this instruction need to be defined, see the definitions contained in
Chapter 720.
Use appl
icable bracketed material.
_____________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-10
- Edition
- 2026-09-10
- Content hash
2730e9f38baaf83753bae039cacc23ca27e6167642c3c2b516f48fada2d52e86
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.