Bindinglaw

IL · jury_instructions

Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 17.00

CANNABIS AND CO

activein force · 2026-09-10 – presentas-observed

NTROLLED SUBSTANCES

DISPO

SITION TABLE

Showing w

here the Pattern Instructions in the Third Edition are covered in the Fourth

Edition.

3d ed. Inst

ruction Number 4th ed. Instruction Number

17.67 …………………………………………………………………………………… 17.65A

INTRODUCTI

ON

Genera

lly, the jury need not be instructed as to the definitions of words which are

contained or defined in the Statute. There will, however, be situations in which a definition will

be necessary. One example would be a prosecution for the possession or delivery of a substance

containing cannabis (720 ILCS 550/4 and 550/5), when there is evidence that raises an issue as

to the nature of the substance involved. In this particular example, give the definition of cannabis

(720 ILCS 550/3(a)) to the jury.

When the ne

ed for a definitional instruction arises, and the particular word is not defined

in these Pattern Instructions, the Committee recommends that the jury be given an instruction

which defines the term involved as set out in the appropriate section of the Statute (720 ILCS

550/3; 720 ILCS 570/102), with inapplicable language deleted, to avoid confusing the jury.

_____________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Provenance

Source
illinoiscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-10
Edition
2026-09-10
Content hash
f61926ba0071235a3340750c95843d8f74a10dcafaa212113cdc88d20fa0f620
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.