IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 16.22
Issues In Criminal Trespass To Restricted Areas At Airports
To sust
ain the charge of criminal trespass to restricted areas at airports, the State must
prove the following proposition:
That the defendant [(knowingly) (intentionally) (recklessly)] [(entered upon) (remained
in)] [(any restricted area) (any restricted landing area)] used in connection with an airport
facility [or part thereof] after the defendant had received notice f rom the airport authority that
such entry is forbidden.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that this proposition has been
proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that this proposition has not been
proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Committe
e Note
720 ILCS
5/21-7 (West, 1999) (formerly Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 38, §21-7 (1991)).
Give I
nstruction 16.21.
See Chapt
er 720, Sections 4- 3 and 4- 9 and Committee Note to Instruction 5.01A,
regarding the applicable mental state.
Use appli
cable bracketed material.
When acc
ountability is an issue, ordinarily insert the phrase “or one for whose conduct he
is legally responsible” after the word “defendant” in each proposition. See Instruction 5.03.
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-10
- Edition
- 2026-09-10
- Content hash
0a3b6dbcb3ec1e6b557e0022d6be48f83fdb7e5f7a3fb039d948c6990bc1ec6d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.