IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 16.08
Issues In Institutional Vandalism
To sustain t
he charge of institutional vandalism, the State must prove the following
propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant knowingly and without consent damaged
[1] a [(church) (synagogue) (building, structure, or place used for religious worship or
other religious purpose)].
[or]
[2] a [(c
emetery) (mortuary) (facility used for the purpose of burial or memorializing the
dead)].
[or]
[3] a [(s
chool) (educational facility) (community center)].
[or]
[4] the gr
ounds adjacent to, and owned or rented by, a
[a] [(church) (synagogue) (structure or place used for a religious purpose)].
[or]
[b] [(cem
etery) (mortuary) (facility used for the purpose of burial or
memorializing the dead)].
[or]
[c] [(school) (
educational facility) (community center)].
[or]
[5] any per
sonal property contained in a
[a] [(church) (synagogue) (building, structure, or place used for religious worship
or other religious purpose)];
[or]
[b] [(ceme
tery) (mortuary) (fa cility used for the purpose of burial or
memorializing the dead)];
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
[or]
[c] [(sc
hool) (educational facility) (community center)];
and
Second Proposi
tion: That the defenda nt inflicted the damage by reason of the actual or
perceived [(race) (color) (creed) (religion) (national origin)] of another individual or group of
individuals[(; and) (.)]
[Third Proposition: That the damage exceeded $300.]
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Committe
e Note
720 ILCS 5/
21-1.2 (West, 1992) (formerly Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 38, §21- 1.2 (1991))<us>,
amended by P.A. 88-659, effective September 16, 1994</us>.
Give I
nstruction 16.07.
Use appl
icable paragraphs, subparagraphs, and bracketed material.
Give the br
acketed Third Proposition only when the issue arises whether the amount of
the damage exceeds $300. See the Committee Note to Instruction 16.07.
The bracke
ted numbers and letters are present solely for the guidance of court and
counsel and should not be included in the instruction submitted to the jury.
When acc
ountability is an issue, ordinarily insert the phrase “or one for whose conduct he
is legally responsible” after the word “defendant” in each proposition. See Instruction 5.03.
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-10
- Edition
- 2026-09-10
- Content hash
cba093f668b8415f3e38b6ab047a92bb835776a0690ab9037b46b620663da7ce
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.