IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 15.06A
Issues In Possession Of Explosives Or Incendiary Devices Knowing Of Another's Intended
Use
To sustain the charge of possession of [(explosives) (incendiary devices)], the State must
prove the following propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant knowingly [(possessed) (manufactured)
(transported)] a[n] [(explosive compound) (timing or detonating device for use with any
explosive compound or incendiary device)]; and
Second Proposition: That the defendant knew that another intended to use such
[(explosive compound) (timing or detonating device)] to commit the offense[s] of ____.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
9b1442dce6ecde44a23ebe5f7ed5d19b24e6f00d7d38451be3c5a5c5e7bc7f18
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.