IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 13.69
Issues In Home Repair Fraud--Assumed Business Name Act
To sustain the charge of home repair fraud, the State must prove the following
propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant knowingly entered into [(an agreement) (a
contract)] with a person for home repair; and
Second Proposition: That the defendant ____; and
Third Proposition: That the defendant [(misrepresented) (concealed)] [(his real name)
(the name of his business) (his business address)] [(.) (; and)]
[Fourth Proposition: That the amount of the [(agreement[s] ) (contract[s] )] was more
than $1,000[(.) (; and)]]
[Fifth Proposition: That the defendant entered into such [(agreement[s] ) (contract[s] )]
as part of or in furtherance of a common fraudulent scheme, design, or intention.]
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
c5a2c6131e344cb8361713bc41f869326413805b873089ff9568ac4d1abd1f76
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.