IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 13.67
Issues In Home Repair Fraud--Unconscionable Agreement Or Contract
To sustain the charge of home repair fraud, the State must prove the following
propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant knowingly entered into [(an agreement) (a
contract)] with a person for home repair; and
Second Proposition: That the [(agreement) (contract)] required payment to the
contractor [(of at least $4,000) (of at least $4,000 but not more than $10,000) (more than
$10,000)]; and
Third Proposition: That the defendant knowingly entered into an unconscionable [
(agreement) (contract)].
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
34dbe79237c19c5690a07c3d86bfbbb9859b20688d2d1a1c95a0c991cdb77a3b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.