IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 13.61
Issues In Insurance Fraud Conspiracy
To sustain the charge of insurance fraud conspiracy, the State must prove the following
propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant [(knowingly) (intentionally) (recklessly)] agreed
with another to commit [(insurance fraud) (aggravated insurance fraud)]; and
Second Proposition: That the defendant did so with the intent that the [(insurance fraud)
(aggravated insurance fraud)] would be committed; and
Third Proposition: That [(the defendant) (a co- conspirator)] committed an overt act or
acts in furtherance of committing [(insurance fraud) (aggravated insurance fraud)]; and
Fourth Proposition: That the defendant was a part of a common scheme or plan to
engage in the unlawful activity.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
35944009dc7fd51c6028ab5e659c59e89935ec5934a08e66e1603c2a49bb4cb3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.