IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 13.59
Issues In Aggravated Insurance Fraud
To sustain the charge of aggravated insurance fraud, the State must prove the following
propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant knowingly made three or more claims to [(an
insurance company) (insurance companies)] under any insurance [(policy) (policies)] issued by
any insurance [(company) (companies)]; and
Second Proposition: That the defendant knew that all these claims were false; and
Third Proposition: That each claim allegedly arose out of a separate [(incident)
(transaction)]; and
Fourth Proposition: That the defendant knowingly and by deception [(obtained control)
(attempted to obtain control) (caused control to be obtained)] over the property of any insurance
[(company) (companies)] three times or more by making these false claims; and
Fifth Proposition: That the defendant did so within a period of 18 months; and
Sixth Proposition: That the defendant at all three or more times intended to permanently
deprive the insurance company of the use and benefit of the property.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
05965274af76b3804ade1083a0fd8bbf20dc52881d60f1d64590e5fbd33385c5
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.