IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 13.50C
Issues In Computer Tampering--Inserting A Program
To sustain the charge of computer tampering, the State must prove the following
propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant knowingly [(inserted) (attempted to insert)] a
program into a [(computer) (computer program)]; and
Second Proposition: That the defendant [(knew) (had reason to believe)] that the
program which he [(inserted) (attempted to insert)] contained information or commands that [
(would) (might)] [(damage that computer or any other computer subsequently accessing or
being accessed by that computer) (destroy that computer or any other computer subsequently
accessing or being accessed by that computer) (alter a computer program or data from that
computer or any other computer program or data in a computer subsequently accessing or being
accessed by that computer) (delete a computer program or data from that computer or any other
computer program or data in a computer subsequently accessing or being accessed by that
computer) (remove a computer program or data from that computer or any other computer
program or data in a computer subsequently accessing or being accessed by that computer)
(cause loss to the users of that computer or the users of a computer which accesses or which is
accessed by such program)]; and
Third Proposition: That the defendant acted [(without the authorization of the
computer's owner) (in excess of the authority granted to him by the computer's owner)]; and
Fourth Proposition: That the defendant knew that he acted [(without the authorization of
the computer's owner) (in excess of the authority granted to him by the computer's owner)].
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
4fa3b97b4c1dc849cd9ce722c4ef7c7eee072523d2bc2444b2c4be6c617149db
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.