IL · jury_instructions

Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 13.32

Issues In Unlawful Subleasing Of A Motor Vehicle

activein force · 2026-08-19 – presentas-observed

To sustain the charge of unlawful subleasing of a motor vehicle, the State must prove the

following propositions:

First Proposition: That the defendant [(intentionally) (knowingly) (recklessly)] [

(obtained) (exercised control)] over a motor vehicle; and

Second Proposition: That the defendant [(intentionally) (knowingly) (reckl essly)] [

(sold) (transferred) (assigned) (leased)] the motor vehicle to another person; and

Third Proposition: That the defendant [(intentionally) (knowingly) (recklessly)] did not

obtain written authorization from the [(secured creditor) (lessor) (lienholder)] for the [(sale)

(transfer) (assignment) (lease)]; and

Fourth Proposition: That the defendant [(intentionally) (knowingly) (recklessly)]

received [(compensation) (consideration)] for the [(sale) (transfer) (assignment) (lease)] of the

motor vehicle; and

Fifth Proposition: That the defendant was not a party to a [(lease contract) (conditional

sale contract) (security agreement)] which transferred any right of interest in the motor vehicle.

[or]

First Proposition: That the defendant [(intentionally) (knowingly) (recklessly)] [

(assisted) (caused) (arranged)] the [(actual) (purported)] [(sale) (transfer) (assignment) (lease)

] of a motor vehicle to another person; and

Second Proposition: That the defendant [(intentionally) (knowingly) (recklessly)] did

not obtain written authorization from the [(secured creditor) (lessor) (lienholder)] for the [(sale)

(transfer) (assignment) (lease)]; and

Third Proposition: That the defendant [(intentionally) (knowingl y) (recklessly)]

received [(compensation) (consideration)] for [(assisting) (causing) (arranging)] the [(sale)

(transfer) (assignment) (lease)] of the motor vehicle; and

Fourth Proposition: That the defendant was not a party to a [(lease contract) (conditional

sale contract) (security agreement)] which transfers any right of interest in the motor vehicle.

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions

has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions

has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.

Provenance

Source: illinoiscourts.gov
Retrieved: 2026-08-20
Edition: 2026-08-19
Content hash: 020ef3a85cd66864b5ffc2ba52fd6cf0700f40d2d90f224dfbfb467cab315041

View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs