IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 13.24
Issues In Theft By Obtaining Control Over Stolen Property--Misdemeanor
To sustain the charge of theft, the State must prove the following propositions:
First Proposition: That ____ was the owner of the ____ in question; and
Second Proposition: That the defendant knowingly obtained control over the ____ in
question; and
Third Proposition: That the defendant knew the ____ had been stolen by another;
[or]
Third Proposition: That the defendant obtained control under such circumstances as
would reasonably induce him to believe the ____ was stolen;
and
Fourth Proposition: That the defendant intended to deprive the owner permanently of the
use or benefit of ____.
[or]
Fourth Proposition: That the defendant knowingly [(used) (concealed) (abandoned)] the
____ in such manner as to deprive ____ permanently of the use or benefit.
[or]
Fourth Proposition: That the defendant [(used) (concealed) (abandoned)] the ____
knowing that the owner will thereby probably be deprived permanently of its use or benefit.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
9ce7951dd1ed5202c92b09177cd5f5ff5ce2ea61b8319402e83796be7758e5ff
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.