IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 13.20
Issues In Theft By Deception Of Property Having A Value Of $5,000 Or More From A
Victim 60 Years Of Age Or Older
To sustain the charge of theft, the State must prove the following propositions:
First Proposition: That ____ was the owner of the property in question; and
Second Proposition: That the defendant by deception knowingly obtained control over
the property in question; and
Third Proposition: That the defendant intended to deprive the owner thereof permanently
of the use or benefit of that property;
[or]
Third Proposition: That the defendant knowingly [(used) (concealed) (abandoned)] the
property in question in such manner as to deprive the owner thereof permanently of the use or
benefit of that property;
[or]
Third Proposition: That the defendant [(used) (concealed) (abandoned)] the property in
question knowing that such [(use) (concealment) (abandonment)] probably will deprive the
owner thereof permanently of the use or benefit of that property;
and
Fourth Proposition: That the property in question had a value of $5,000 or more; and
Fifth Proposition: That ____ was 60 years of age or older.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
9936b0b1f790a823304e7270175804d3484bec5dd77a4aec9493c60e06e0cd4e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.