IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 13.02A
Issues In Theft By Unauthorized Control Of Property Not Exceeding $500 In Value –
Enhancing Factors Based Upon Governmental Property Or Location
To sustain the charge of theft, the State must prove the following propositions:
First Proposition: That ____ was the owner of the property in question; and
Second Proposition: That the defendant knowingly [(obtained) (exerted)] unauthorized
control over the property in question; and
Third Proposition: That the property in question was governmental property; and
[or]
Third Proposition: That when the defendant did so he was in a [(school) (place of
worship)]; and
Fourth Proposition: That the defendant intended to deprive the owner thereof
permanently of the use or benefit of that property.
[or]
Fourth Proposition: That the defendant knowingly [(used) (concealed) (abandoned)] the
property in question in such manner as to deprive the owner thereof permanently of the use or
benefit of that property.
[or]
Fourth Proposition: That the defendant [(used) (concealed) (abandoned)] the property in
question knowing that such [(use) (concealment) (abandonment)] probably will deprive the
owner thereof permanently of the use or benefit of that property.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
c0fefebd891d46010c6160969e69cd685ecde06774e3131416582214e06e4f95
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.