IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 12.04X
Issues In Eavesdropping--Use Or Divulgence Of Information (As Of December 15, 1994)
To sustain the charge of eavesdropping by use or divulgence of information, the State
must prove the following propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant used or divulged any information obtained from a
conversation; and
Second Proposition: That the defendant did so without the consent of all parties to t hat
conversation; and
Third Proposition: That the defendant knew or reasonably should have known that this
information was obtained through the use of an eavesdropping device.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
c5c401635d48dcef7acec2c509adc0adf72586bc9bbebd3be6bea6e7391a49ef
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.