IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 11.94
Issues In Vehicular Invasion
To sustain the charge of vehicular invasion, the State must prove the following
propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant knowingly [(entered) (reached into)] the interior
of a motor vehicle; and
Second Proposition: That the defendant did so by force; and
Third Proposition: That the motor vehicle was occupied by another person; and
Fourth Proposition: That the defendant did so with the intent to commit therein [(a theft)
(the offense of ____)].
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
219a12e09f0fe4685aed8fadb45f3772cd8d04a23f4de659436cb3056eacf485
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.