IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 11.92
Issues In Aggravated Stalking--Violation Of A Court Order (Until August 20, 1993)
To sustain the charge of aggravated stalking, the State must first prove that the defendant
committed the offense of stalking. To sustain the charge of stalking, the State must prove the
following propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant transmitted a threat to ____; and
Second Proposition: That the defendant did so with the intent to place ____ in reasonable
apprehension of [(death) (bodily harm) (sexual assault) (confinement) (restraint)]; and
Third Proposition: That the defendant, in furtherance of that threat, did [any one or more
of] the following act[s] on at least two separate occasions:
[1] knowingly followed ____, other than within the residence of the defendant;
[or]
[2] knowingly placed ____ under surveillance by remaining present outside [(the school
of ____) (the place of employment of ____) (the vehicle of ____) (any place occupied by
____) (the residence of ____ other than the residence of the defendant)];
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, your deliberations on these charges should end
and you should return a verdict of not guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, then you have concluded that the defendant
committed the offense of stalking. You should now go on with your deliberations to decide
whether the defendant is guilty of aggravated stalking.
To sustain the charge of aggravated stalking, the State must prove the following
additional proposition:
Fourth Proposition: That, in conjunction with committing the offense of stalking, the
defendant [(intentionally) (knowingly) (recklessly)] violated [(a temporary restraining order)
(an order of protection) (an injunction)] prohibiting the [(harassment) (interference with
personal liberty) (physical abuse) (willful deprivation) (neglect) (exploitation) (intimidation of a
dependent)] of ____.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that this Fourth Proposition has
also been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty of aggravated
stalking.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that this Fourth Proposition has
not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, then you should find the defendant not guilty of
aggravated stalking [and guilty of stalking].
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
7493f59171bff1307345fdc00ad65539f808dd3b4daae2abad26597ddbc14cde
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.