Bindinglaw

IL · jury_instructions

Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 11.92

Issues In Aggravated Stalking--Violation Of A Court Order (Until August 20, 1993)

activein force · 2026-08-19 – presentas-observed

To sustain the charge of aggravated stalking, the State must first prove that the defendant

committed the offense of stalking. To sustain the charge of stalking, the State must prove the

following propositions:

First Proposition: That the defendant transmitted a threat to ____; and

Second Proposition: That the defendant did so with the intent to place ____ in reasonable

apprehension of [(death) (bodily harm) (sexual assault) (confinement) (restraint)]; and

Third Proposition: That the defendant, in furtherance of that threat, did [any one or more

of] the following act[s] on at least two separate occasions:

[1] knowingly followed ____, other than within the residence of the defendant;

[or]

[2] knowingly placed ____ under surveillance by remaining present outside [(the school

of ____) (the place of employment of ____) (the vehicle of ____) (any place occupied by

____) (the residence of ____ other than the residence of the defendant)];

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions

has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, your deliberations on these charges should end

and you should return a verdict of not guilty.

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions

has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, then you have concluded that the defendant

committed the offense of stalking. You should now go on with your deliberations to decide

whether the defendant is guilty of aggravated stalking.

To sustain the charge of aggravated stalking, the State must prove the following

additional proposition:

Fourth Proposition: That, in conjunction with committing the offense of stalking, the

defendant [(intentionally) (knowingly) (recklessly)] violated [(a temporary restraining order)

(an order of protection) (an injunction)] prohibiting the [(harassment) (interference with

personal liberty) (physical abuse) (willful deprivation) (neglect) (exploitation) (intimidation of a

dependent)] of ____.

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that this Fourth Proposition has

also been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty of aggravated

stalking.

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that this Fourth Proposition has

not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, then you should find the defendant not guilty of

aggravated stalking [and guilty of stalking].

Provenance

Source
illinoiscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-19
Content hash
7493f59171bff1307345fdc00ad65539f808dd3b4daae2abad26597ddbc14cde
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.