Bindinglaw

IL · jury_instructions

Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 11.76

Issues In Criminal Neglect Of An Elderly Or Disabled Person

activein force · 2026-08-19 – presentas-observed

To sustain the charge of criminal neglect of [(an elderly) (a disabled)] person, the State

must prove the following propositions:

First Proposition: That the defendant was a caregiver; and

[1] Second Proposition: That the defendant knowingly performed acts which caused the

[(elderly) (disabled)] person's life to be endangered, health to be injured, or pre-existing

physical or mental condition to deteriorate.

[or]

[2] Second Proposition: That the defendant knowingly failed to perform acts which he

knew or should have known were necessary to maintain or preserve the life or health of the [

(elderly) (disabled)] person and such failure caused the [(elderly) (disabled)] person's life to be

endangered, health to be injured, or pre-existing physical or mental condition to deteriorate.

[or]

[3] Second Proposition : That the defendant knowingly abandoned the [(elderly)

(disabled)] person.

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions

has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions

has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.

Provenance

Source
illinoiscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-19
Content hash
b78e6a9c0a57602ffa330e4c0fede24d3af71a3f698fe730e07eb2816dfa6786
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 11.76 · binding.law