Bindinglaw

IL · jury_instructions

Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 11.42X

Issues In Aggravated Intimidation

activein force · 2026-08-19 – presentas-observed

To sustain the charge of intimidation, the State must prove the following propositions:

First Proposition: That the defendant was a streetgang member; and

Second Proposition: That the defendant committed the offense of intimidation, and

Third Proposition: That the defendant did so in furtherance of the activities of an

organized gang.

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions

has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions

has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.

Provenance

Source
illinoiscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-19
Content hash
ca499d371b49640f2e68007abfe1c48fe615590ed1e5e33cb191779f15157937
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.