IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 11.40
Issues In Criminal Housing Management
To sustain the charge of criminal housing management, the State must prove the
following propositions:
First Proposition: That the defendant had [(personal management) (control)] of the real
estate as a [(legal owner) (equitable owner) (managing agent)]; and
Second Proposition: That the nature of the real estate at ____ was residential; and
Third Proposition: That the defendant knowingly, by his gross [(carelessness) (neglect)]
permitted the real estate to become or remain so deteriorated that the [(health) (safety)] of an
inhabitant was endangered.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each one of these propositions
has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any one of these propositions
has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
260a22f23c001f113983ecd726a3419dd57b5b13f1689dd05ec1354cff3bffba
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.