IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 800.09A
Fraud and Deceit --Burden of Proof on the Issues --Alternative One--Fraudulent
Concealment--One Plaintiff and One Defendant --Clear And Convincing Evidence Only as
to Certain Elements
The plaintiff has the burden of proving each of the following propositions by clear and
convincing evidence:
First, the defendant knowingly [concealed] [withheld] from the plaintiff [a] material
fact[s];
Second, that the defendant [concealed] [withheld] the fact[s] with the intent to deceive
the plaintiff and induce the plaintiff to [act] [describe what the plaintiff did, e.g., “buy the farm”].
The plaintiff has the burden of proving each of the following propositions is more
probably true than not true:
Third, the plaintiff [acted] [describe what the plaintiff did, e.g., “bought the farm”] in
justifiable reliance on the facts as he knew them;
Fourth, the plaintiff's damages resulted from the [concealment] [withholding] of [a]
material fact[s] by the defendant.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that propositions First and Second
have been proved by clea r and convincing evidence and that propositions Third and Fourth are
more probably true than not true, then your verdict should be for the plaintiff. On the other hand,
if you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any of these propositions has not been
proved as required in this instruction, then your verdict should be for the defendant.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
bd6964fdfd5af9fe1e241e0e794e5824d27614278e27b4046436059f2f555c9a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.