Bindinglaw

IL · jury_instructions

Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 710.03

Insurance Bad Faith--Burden of Proof

activein force · 2026-08-19 – presentas-observed

The plaintiff has the burden of proving all of the following propositions:

First, that as of [date on which the settlement demand within policy limits was made or, if

applicable, the date on which plaintiff’s demand for settlement within policy limits expired], there

was both a reasonable probability of a finding of liability against [name of the insured] and a

reasonable probability of a recovery against [name of the insured] in excess of the limits of its

policy’s coverage.

Second, that as of [date on which the settlement demand within policy limits was made or,

if applicable, the date on which the plaintiff’s demand for settlement within policy limits expired],

[name of insurance co mpany] had a reasonable opportunity to settle [name of injured person]’s

claim against [name of the insured] within the limits of its policy’s coverage.

[First,] [Second,] that [name of insurance company] acted or failed to act in one of the ways

claimed by the plaintiff as stated to you in these instructions and that in so acting, or failing to act,

[name of insurance company] acted in bad faith with respect to [name of insured]'s interests;

[Second,] [Third,] that [name of insurance company]'s bad faith proximately caused the

judgment in excess of the policy limits to be entered against [name of insured].

Plaintiff must establish that liability in excess of the policy limits in the underlying suit

was at least more likely than not, but not necessarily a certainty.

[[Name of insurance company] has asserted the affirmative defense that [summarize

affirmative defense]. [name of insurance company] has the burden of proving this affirmative

defense.]

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that all of the propositions required

of the plaintiff have been proved [and that the defendant's affirmative defense has not been

proved], then your verdict should be for the plaintiff. On the other hand, if you find from your

consideration of all the evidence that any of the propositions required of the plaintiff has not been

proved [or that [name of insurance company]'s affirmative defense has been proved], then your

verdict should be for [name of insurance company].

Provenance

Source
illinoiscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-19
Content hash
869a9dcaf248fbf4eafe607f1830a0263d1f5336699ce49ccc66c3f2095ae454
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 710.03 — Insurance B… · binding.law