IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 300.16
Issues Made by Complaint and Counterclaim—
Easement Strip—Underground Pipeline or
Cable—Fact of Damage to Remainder
Contested
This is a proceeding in which the plaintiff, e.g., Public Gas Company, has filed a
complaint to acquire a perpetual easement to operate and maintain a e.g., pipeline across the
property of the defendant, by exercising the power of eminent domain. Eminent domain is the
power given by law to a [public body] [public service company] to take private property for a
public use. The constitution of the State of Illinois provides that private property shall not be
taken or damaged for public use without just compensation.
The defendant has filed a counterclaim claiming that property outside the easement strip
will be damaged by the taking. Plaintiff denies that the property outside the easement strip will
be damaged.
You are to decide the following questions:
First, what is the amount of money which will reasonably and fairly compensate the
defendant for the damage within the easement strip caused by the presence of the easement.
Second, will the property outside the easement strip be damaged by the presence of the
easement and, if so, then,
Third, what is the amount of money which will reasonably and fairly compensate the
defendant for that damage.
You must not concern yourselves with the right of plaintiff to acquire the easement, the
need for the easement or the wisdom of locating the e.g., pipeline on the defendant's property.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
32869c44351fe166210dcabbd7aa45d04313f9f03367ca22dd5feb9e5f1ce9eb
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.