Bindinglaw

IL · jury_instructions

Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 30.09

Measure of Damages--Caretaking Expenses, Necessary Help--Past and Future--Adult

activein force · 2026-09-10 – presentas-observed

Plaintiff, Emancipated Minor, or Minor Whose Parent Has Assigned Claim to Minor

The reaso

nable expense of necessary help [and the present cash value of such expense

reasonably certain to be required in the future].

Instruc

tion and Comment revised January 2010.

Notes o

n Use

This el

ement is to be inserted between the paragraphs of IPI 30.01 when the evidence

justifies its use.

To incl

ude the bracketed material relating to future caretaking expense, there must be

evidence that such expense is reasonably certain to be incurred in the future.

If the pl

aintiff is a minor or minor's representative and the right to recover these expenses

during minority has not been assigned to the minor, use IPI 30.08.

Commen

t

Plaintiff

is entitled to recover all damages that naturally and proximately flow from the

tort. Horan v. Klein's -Sheridan, Inc., 62 Ill.App.2d 455, 459, 211 N.E.2d 116, 118 (3d Dist.

1965). Incidental caretaker expenses resulting from personal injuries are therefore appropriate

elements of damages. Hoobler v. Voelpel, 246 Ill.App. 69 (2d Dist. 1927) (court allowed

recovery of expense of hiring help in plaintiff's home during convalescence). Recovery is not

limited to caretaking expenses incurred in the home, however, and extends to all necessary help

reasonably incurred as a result of the injury suffered. In North Chicago St. R. Co. v. Zeiger, 182

Ill. 9, 54 N.E. 1006 (1899), the Illinois Supreme Court approved the use of this instruction where

plaintiff, a butcher employing 25 workers, had to pay a substitute superintendent to perform

plaintiff's duties for a period of five months after his accident. Worley v. Barger, 347 Ill.App.3d

492, 807 N.E.2d 1222, 283 Ill. Dec. 381(5th Dist. 2004) (the court noted plaintiff should be

permitted to seek recovery for the reasonable value of caretaking services that would have been

allowed had someone been employed to care for her child).

On the is

sue of present cash value, see the 34.00 series.

_____________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Provenance

Source
illinoiscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-10
Edition
2026-09-10
Content hash
916f0c9a307b4301a841283fcbb28f9b814b86c81b1db6f1210cca02a8d595f0
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.