IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 255.15
HUMAN RIGHTS ACT - BURDEN OF PROOF - RETALIATION
Plaintiff claims that defendant[s] retaliated against plaintiff because plaintiff [describe
plaintiff’s protected activity]. To succeed on this claim, plaintiff must prove by a preponderance
of the evidence the following:
1. That plaintiff had a reasonable and good faith belief that plaintiff had been
[discriminated against and/or harassed];
2. That plaintiff [engaged in protected activity];
3. That defendant[s] [describe action adverse to plaintiff];
4. That defendant’s action [describe the action adverse to plaintiff] was materially adverse
to plaintiff;
5. The defendant[s] took the materially adverse action because plaintiff [engaged in
protected activity];
6. That, because of the materially adverse action, plaintiff sustained damages.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each of these propositions has
been proven, then your verdict should be for plaintiff. On the other hand, if you find from your
consideration of all the evidence that any of these propositions has not been proven, then your
verdict should be for defendant.
Instruction and Notes on Use approved December 2022.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
749e41a3e9cdabf219eaf38b49b2d43c79890c5d260c0a73a93b41087212b48f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.