IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 255.02
HUMAN RIGHTS ACT -MATERIAL ADVERSE ACTION EMPLOYMENT
DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS- BURDEN OF PROOF INSTRUCTION
Burden of Proof on the Issues – Material Adverse Action Employment Discrimination
Claims
As to [his/her/their] claim of discrimination [in Count ... of the Complaint] the plaintiff
has the burden of proving each of the following propositions by a preponderance of the evidence:
a) The plaintiff is a member of a protected class;
b) The plaintiff was performing [his/her/their] job duties to the defendant’s legitimate
expectations;
c) The defendant took material adverse action toward the plaintiff;
d) The defendant took the material adverse action because of the plaintiff’s [insert
plaintiff’s protected class status; e.g., age, gender, race, sexual orientation,
national origin]; and
e) The plaintiff sustained damages because of the defendant’s material adverse action.
[In considering whether the defendant took material adverse action toward the plaintiff
because of the plaintiff’s [insert plaintiff’s protected class status; e.g., age, gender, race, sexual
orientation, national origin], you must consider the defendant’s stated reason(s) for taking this
action.]
[In considering the defendant’s stated reason(s) for [his/her/its/their] decision, you should
not concern yourselves with whether the defendant’s action(s) (was/were) correct, wise,
reasonable, or fair. Rather, your concern is only whether the plaintiff has proved by a
preponderance of the evidence that the defendant’s stated reason(s) for [briefly describe the
material adverse action taken by the defendant toward the plaintiff alleged to have violated the
Human Rights Act] (was/were) a pretext for discrimination.]
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any of these propositions has
not been proved, then your verdict will be for the defendant and you should proceed to
Verdict Form . . . .
On the other hand, if you find from your consideration of all the evidence that the
plaintiff has proved all of the propositions required of [him/her/them] as set forth in this
instruction, then your verdict will be for the plaintiff and you will proceed to Verdict Form . . . .
Instruction, Notes on Use and Comment approved December 2022.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
f89e7431f67d5fa856386bd583afd218d1b72773914f70db46f3f29a93cc4e35
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.