Bindinglaw

IL · jury_instructions

Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 255.02

HUMAN RIGHTS ACT -MATERIAL ADVERSE ACTION EMPLOYMENT

activein force · 2026-08-19 – presentas-observed

DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS- BURDEN OF PROOF INSTRUCTION

Burden of Proof on the Issues – Material Adverse Action Employment Discrimination

Claims

As to [his/her/their] claim of discrimination [in Count ... of the Complaint] the plaintiff

has the burden of proving each of the following propositions by a preponderance of the evidence:

a) The plaintiff is a member of a protected class;

b) The plaintiff was performing [his/her/their] job duties to the defendant’s legitimate

expectations;

c) The defendant took material adverse action toward the plaintiff;

d) The defendant took the material adverse action because of the plaintiff’s [insert

plaintiff’s protected class status; e.g., age, gender, race, sexual orientation,

national origin]; and

e) The plaintiff sustained damages because of the defendant’s material adverse action.

[In considering whether the defendant took material adverse action toward the plaintiff

because of the plaintiff’s [insert plaintiff’s protected class status; e.g., age, gender, race, sexual

orientation, national origin], you must consider the defendant’s stated reason(s) for taking this

action.]

[In considering the defendant’s stated reason(s) for [his/her/its/their] decision, you should

not concern yourselves with whether the defendant’s action(s) (was/were) correct, wise,

reasonable, or fair. Rather, your concern is only whether the plaintiff has proved by a

preponderance of the evidence that the defendant’s stated reason(s) for [briefly describe the

material adverse action taken by the defendant toward the plaintiff alleged to have violated the

Human Rights Act] (was/were) a pretext for discrimination.]

If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any of these propositions has

not been proved, then your verdict will be for the defendant and you should proceed to

Verdict Form . . . .

On the other hand, if you find from your consideration of all the evidence that the

plaintiff has proved all of the propositions required of [him/her/them] as set forth in this

instruction, then your verdict will be for the plaintiff and you will proceed to Verdict Form . . . .

Instruction, Notes on Use and Comment approved December 2022.

Provenance

Source
illinoiscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-19
Content hash
f89e7431f67d5fa856386bd583afd218d1b72773914f70db46f3f29a93cc4e35
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 255.02 — HUMAN RIGHT… · binding.law