Bindinglaw

IL · jury_instructions

Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 22.02

Res Ipsa Loquitur and Specific Negligence As Alternative Theories of Recovery

activein force · 2026-08-19 – presentas-observed

Under our law [a plaintiff] [[plaintiff's name]] may attempt to prove in either of two ways

that [a defendant] [[defendant's name]] was negligent. He may prove either what [a defendant]

[defendant's name] actually did or did not do, or, on the other hand, he may attempt to prove the

following propositions: [[complete this instruction by using IPI B22.01, omitting the first

sentence of that instruction.]]

Provenance

Source
illinoiscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-19
Content hash
9729eb080402e7ca1cab3618718e22c17a2b2fc4e6ef64f80f0c845e24e3ec59
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.