IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 205.01
Tortious Interference With Expectancy —
Issues Made by the Pleadings
The issues to be decided by you under [Count ____ of] the plaintiff's complaint are as
follows:
[1]. The plaintiff claims that he had an expectation that he would receive an inheritance
from the decedent upon the decedent's death;
[2]. The plaintiff further claims that the defendant, through [fraud,] [duress,] [or] [undue
influence], intentionally interfered with plaintiff's expectation in one or more of the following
ways:
[Set forth in simple form, without undue emphasis or
repetition, those alleged grounds of intentional
interference which are supported by the evidence.]
[3]. The plaintiff fur ther claims that there was a reasonable certainty that the plaintiff's
expectancy would have been realized but for the defendant's interference;
[4]. The plaintiff further claims that he has suffered damages as a result of the loss of
inheritance.
The defendant denies [that there was a reasonable certainty that the plaintiff would
receive an inheritance from the decedent] [that he interfered with the plaintiff's expectancy in any
manner claimed by the plaintiff] [that he did any of the things claime d by the plaintiff] [that the
plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the loss of the inheritance].
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
61e77d0d3576b22e2a987f7542126ce01d0d6540400948df888b00491963da21
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.