Bindinglaw

IL · jury_instructions

Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 205.01

Tortious Interference With Expectancy —

activein force · 2026-08-19 – presentas-observed

Issues Made by the Pleadings

The issues to be decided by you under [Count ____ of] the plaintiff's complaint are as

follows:

[1]. The plaintiff claims that he had an expectation that he would receive an inheritance

from the decedent upon the decedent's death;

[2]. The plaintiff further claims that the defendant, through [fraud,] [duress,] [or] [undue

influence], intentionally interfered with plaintiff's expectation in one or more of the following

ways:

[Set forth in simple form, without undue emphasis or

repetition, those alleged grounds of intentional

interference which are supported by the evidence.]

[3]. The plaintiff fur ther claims that there was a reasonable certainty that the plaintiff's

expectancy would have been realized but for the defendant's interference;

[4]. The plaintiff further claims that he has suffered damages as a result of the loss of

inheritance.

The defendant denies [that there was a reasonable certainty that the plaintiff would

receive an inheritance from the decedent] [that he interfered with the plaintiff's expectancy in any

manner claimed by the plaintiff] [that he did any of the things claime d by the plaintiff] [that the

plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the loss of the inheritance].

Provenance

Source
illinoiscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-19
Content hash
61e77d0d3576b22e2a987f7542126ce01d0d6540400948df888b00491963da21
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 205.01 — Tortious In… · binding.law