IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 185.00
MAGNUSON-MOSS
ACT INTRODUCTION
The Magnuson-Moss Act was enacted in 1975 “to improve the adequacy of information
available to consumers, prevent deception and improve competition” with respect to consumer
products issued with written warranties. 15 U.S.C. § 2302 (a) (1994). The Act was designed to
protect consumers from deceptive warranty practices by establishing standards for the form and
content of written warranties. Lysek v. Elmhurst Dodge, Inc., 325 I ll. App. 3d 536, 259 I ll. Dec.
454 (2001).
The Act applies to consumer pro ducts, which are tan gible items of personal proper ty
“normally used for personal, family or household purposes.” 15 U.S.C. § 2301 (1) (1975). The
Act does not require that manufacturers give a warranty; however, if a written warranty is given,
the Act “imposes certain require ments as to its contents, disclosures, and the effect of extending
a written wa rranty.” Szajna v. Gen. Motors Corp., 115 I ll. 2d 294, 312, 503 N.E.2d 760, 768
(1986). Written warranties must be designated as either “full” or “limited.” 15 U.S.C. § 2304
(1976). “A warrantor giving a ‘full’ written warranty may not impose any limitations on the
duration of an implied warranty and may not exclude or limit consequential damages for breach
of a written or implied warranty.” Szajna, 115 Ill. 2d at 312-13 (citing 15 U.S.C. § 2304 (1976)).
Within a reasonable amount of time, a full written warranty must offer a remedy of repai r,
replacement or refund, at t he option of the warrantor, for any defect, malfunction or failure to
comply with the written warranty, without charge to the consumer. 15 U.S.C. § 2304 (a) (1); 15
U.S.C. § 2301 (10-12 ). Onl y a supplier giving a limited written warranty may disclaim or modify
an implied warranty; and, the only modificat ion allowed is that the duration of the implied
warranty may be limited to the duration of the written warranty “if such limitation is
conscionable and is clearly set forth.” Szajna, 115 Ill. 2d at 313 (citing 15 U.S.C. § 2308 (1976)).
Introduction approved January 2007.
185.01. Statutory Provisions
At the time of the [sale] [lease] [service contract] of the [vehicle] [product] there was in
force a federal statute known as the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. That Act provided that a
consumer who is damaged by the failure of a [manufa cturer] [seller] [suppl ier] [service
contractor] [warrantor] to comply with a [wri tten] [and/or] [implied] warranty may bring suit for
[damages], [refund], [repair], or [replacement].
Instruction and Comment approved January 2007.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-10
- Edition
- 2026-09-10
- Content hash
cb74471cf0268dcfed54fb14bdf88681b93dc26f7b13e94453062fdd85bbeb6e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.