IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 150.09
Dram Shop Act--Burden of Proof--Injury to Person or Property by an
Intoxicated Person--Tavern Operator and Property Owner Both Sued
[In this lawsuit] [In Count ,] plaintiff [(name)] claims [(name)] is entitled to recover
damages from the defendant. The plaintiff must prove:
First, [(name of intoxicated person)] was int ox icated at the time of the [( e.g ., collision)].
Second, the defendant [(tavern op erator)], or his ag ents or se rvants, sold or gave
intoxicating liquors consumed by [(name of intoxicated person)].
Third, the liquor thus consumed caused the intoxication of [(name of intoxi cated
person)].
Fourth, [(intox i cated pe rson)] intoxication was at least one cause of the occurrence in
question.
Fifth, as a re sult of the occurrence, plaintiff suffered [injury] [damage to his property].
In the case against the defendant [name of propert y owner], the plaintiff has the
burden of proving all the foregoing propositions and also must prove the further proposition
that the defendant [name of property owner] [either] [owned], [rented], [lease d] [or] [permitted
the occupa tion of] the premises [knowing that alcoholic liquors we re to be sold there] [or]
[although (owning ), (r enting), (leasing) (or) (pe rmitting the occupation of) the premises for
purposes other than selling alcoholic liquors, knowingly permitted them to be sold there].
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-19
- Content hash
d545bace408b21f4d5ef7883df8ea1479ef2a50bb7f30a0acf04f316a8bae09a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.