Bindinglaw

IL · jury_instructions

Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 13.01

Assumption of Risk--Contractual Relationship--Burden of Proof

activein force · 2026-08-19 – presentas-observed

[As to Co unt ____,] The defendant has raised the affirmative defense that the plaintiff

assumed the risk of injury from the danger which the plaintiff claims caused his injury. To prove

this defense, the defendant has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:

First, that the defendant and the plaintiff had [an agreement] [a contract] under which the

plaintiff was to participate in activities which exposed him to the danger that resulted in the

injury of which he complains[,] [namely, describe danger].

Second, that the danger was one that ordinarily accompanies the activities contemplated

in the [agreement] [contract].

Third, that the plaintiff had actual knowledge of this danger and understood and

appreciated the nature and extent of the risk;

Fourth, that the plaintiff voluntarily subjected himself to this danger; and

Fifth, that this danger was the cause of the plaintiff's [alleged] [injuries] [damages].

If you decide that each of these propositions has been proved, then your verdict should be

for the defendant [as to Count ____]. If, on the other hand, you decide that any of these

propositions has not been proved, then the defendant has not proved the affirmative defense of

assumption of the risk.

Provenance

Source
illinoiscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-19
Content hash
1afd8fcc3aedc3a3fc9212f686c0379a7a73088dacaec5d14511153a89f0f81d
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.