IL · jury_instructions
Ill. Pattern Jury Instr. (Civil) 128.04
Sample Instruction --Premises--Contributory Negligence Claimed (120.08 And
128.02)
[In Count __], plaintiff [plaintiff's name] seeks to recover damages from the defendant
[defendant's name]. In order to recover damages, the plaintiff has the burden of proving:
First, there was a condition on the [property, land, building, ____] which presented an
unreasonable risk of harm to people [children] on the property.
Second, the defendant knew or in the exercise of ordinary care should have known of
both the condition and the risk.
Third, the defendant could reasonably expect that people [children] on the property
[would not discover or realize the danger] [or] [would fail to protect themselves against such
danger].
Fourth, the defendant was negligent in one or more of the following ways:
a) ________,
b) ________,
c) ________.
Fifth, the plaintiff was injured.
Sixth, t he defendant's negligence was a proximate cause of the plaintiff's injury.
If you find from your consideration of all of the evidence that the plaintiff has proved
each of these propositions, then you should consider the defendant's affirmative defense of ____.
In order to defeat the plaintiff's claim, the defendant must prove:
First: ________.
Second: ________.
(List the elements of the affirmative defense.)
If the defendant proves all of these items, your verdict should be for the defendant. If the
defendant has failed to prove each of these propositions, then you must consider the defendant's
claim that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent.
In order to reduce or deny plaintiff damages, the defendant has the burden of proving
each of the following propositions:
First, plaintiff [plaintiff's name] failed to exercise ordinary care [for (his/her) own safety]
[for the safety of (his/her) property] in one or more of the following ways:
a) ________,
b) ________,
c) ________.
Second, plaintiff's failure to exercise ordinary care was a proximate cause of
plaintiff['s][s'] [injury] [and] [damage].
If you find the defendant has not proved both of the propositions required of the
defendant, then your verdict should be for the plaintiff and you will not reduce plaintiff's
damages. You should use Verdict form A.
If you find that the defendant has proved both of the propositions required of the
defendant, and if you find that the plaintiff's contributory negligence was more than 50% of the
total proximate cause of the injury [or damage] for which recovery is sought, then your verdict
should be for the defendant. You should use Verdict form C.
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that the plaintiff has proved all the
propositions required of the plaintiff and that the defendant has proved both of the propositions
required of the defendant, and if you find that the plaintiff's contributory negligence was 50% or
less of the total proximate cause of the [injury] [and] [damage] for which recovery is sought,
then your verdict should be for the plaintiff and you will reduce the plaintiff's damages in the
manner stated to you in these instructions. You should use Verdict form B.
Provenance
- Source
- illinoiscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-10
- Edition
- 2026-09-10
- Content hash
31cc4297ad8524c5e7d53473ee0c7b1a4251fd59596fe8cbc43027613860b30a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.