Bindinglaw

ID · jury_instructions

IDJI 6.22.2

Waiver by estoppel

activein force · 2024-01-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant has raised the defense of waiver by estoppel. This is a legal term which means that a party is deemed to have waived a claimed breach of contract by reason of the party's own conduct. To establish the defense of waiver by estoppel, the defendant has the burden of proof on each of the following propositions:

1. The plaintiff represented to the defendant [by words or conduct] [or] [by silence when a duty to speak and protest the action of the defendant existed] that plaintiff was waiving, excusing or forgiving the defendant's breach of contract; and

2. The defendant relied upon this representation and materially changed position in reliance thereon; and

3. The reliance was reasonable in light of all of the circumstances; and

4. The change of position was to the defendant's detriment.

If you find that each of these propositions has been proved, you should find that the defendant is not liable to the plaintiff for the claimed breach of contract. If the defendant fails to prove all of the propositions, the defendant has not established the affirmative defense of estoppel.

Comments:

Note: This instruction is to be distinguished from "quasi estoppel", "promissory estoppel" or "equitable estoppel."

Provenance

Source
isc.idaho.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-21
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
77e00d5b65bafb87be940cb0c68cd69f04de393f8726e5633e33fcb34bd27766
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.