ID · jury_instructions
IDJI 1.41.2
Charging instruction, plaintiffs case, verdict on special interrogatories
On plaintiffs’ claim of __________ against the defendant __________, the plaintiffs have the burden of proof on each of the following propositions:
1. [Proposition No. 1.]
2. [Proposition No. 2.]
3. [Etc.]
You will be asked the following question on the jury verdict form:
(Insert question exactly as it appears on the verdict form.)
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each of these propositions has been proved, then you should answer this question "yes." If you find from your consideration of all of the evidence that any of these propositions has not been proved, then you should answer this question "no."
Comment:
This instruction is the foundation for a verdict on special interrogatories. A charging instruction such as this should be given for each discrete claim or cause of action covered by a special interrogatory on the verdict form. The introductory sentence may be modified as necessary to specifically refer to each claim or cause of action which is covered by the charging instruction and the special verdict interrogatory to which it relates.
Provenance
- Source
- isc.idaho.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-21
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
a968f58568cbb36e68480fb1cb8144c283849942876c6861015c86926f414b50
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.