ID · jury_instructions
IDJI 1.40.2
Charging instruction plaintiffs case, general verdict
The plaintiff[s] have the burden of proof on each of the following propositions:
1. [Proposition No. 1.]
2. [Proposition no. 2.]
3. [Etc.]
If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that each of these propositions has been proved, then your verdict should be for the plaintiff[s]. If you find from your consideration of all the evidence that any of these propositions has not been proved, then your verdict should be for the defendant[s].
Comment:
This instruction is intended in cases where the jury will be given a general verdict form and special interrogatories will not be used. This instruction is not appropriate for use where affirmative defenses or comparative negligence issues are involved.
Provenance
- Source
- isc.idaho.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-21
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
85430b24c435f8b93ff1ba47fa66e65924aec688cc48753be2ede758faa7d3e8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.