ID · jury_instructions
ICJI 942A
Prostitution – Special Verdict
ICJI 942A PROSTITUTION-SPECIAL VERDICT
PROSTITUTION, SPECIAL VERDICT INSTRUCTION-ENHANCEMENT
In this portion of the case you will return a verdict, consisting of a [series of] question[s] you should answer. Since the explanations on the form which you will have are part of my instructions to you, I will read the body of the verdict form to you.
"We, the Jury, duly impaneled and sworn to try the above entitled action, unanimously answer the question(s) submitted to us as follows:
QUESTION NO. 1: [Did the defendant plead guilty to] [or] [was the defendant found guilty of] a violation of I.C. � 18-5613, Prostitution, in [name of county], Idaho, Case No. ?
ANSWER: YES NO _______
QUESTION NO. 2: [Did the defendant plead guilty to] [or] [was the defendant found guilty of] a violation of I.C. � 18-5613, Prostitution, in [name of county], Idaho, Case No. ?
ANSWER: YES NO]
[QUESTION NO. 3: (Add other prior offenses)
ANSWER: YES NO]
Once you have answered the questions, your presiding juror should date and sign the verdict form and advise the bailiff that you have reached a verdict.
Comment
See ICJI 224 for verdict form.
Provenance
- Source
- isc.idaho.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-21
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
6af631ee26d19bc697af8756174468b925a445ea445599ca48707a99bf76f009
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.