ID · jury_instructions
ICJI 921
Forcible Penetration by Foreign Object
In order for the defendant to be guilty of Forcible Penetration by Foreign Object, the State must prove each of the following:
1. On or about [date]
2. in the State of Idaho
3. the defendant [name] caused an object, instrument, or device, that is, a [item], to penetrate the [genital] [or] [anal] opening of [name or initials of victim]
4. for the purpose of sexual arousal, gratification, or abuse, and[5. the penetration was against [name of person]'s will, and
6. the penetration was accomplished [by the use of force or violence] [or] [by duress] [or] [by threats of immediate and great bodily harm, accompanied by the apparent power to inflict such harm].]
[or]
[5. [name of person] was incapable, through any unsoundness of mind, whether temporary or permanent, of giving legal consent.]
[or]
[5. the penetration was against [name of person]’s will, and
6.[name of person] was prevented from resistance by any [intoxicating] [narcotic] or [anesthetic] substance.]
If any of the above has not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, you must find the defendant not guilty. If each of the above has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant guilty.
Comment
I.C. § 18–6604. See State v. Browning, 123 Idaho 748, 852 P.2d 500 (Ct. App. 1993) (finger is an object); State v. Ericson, 566 P.3d 468, 473 (Idaho Ct. App. 2025) (affirming conviction for forcible penetration by use of a foreign object when object was finger).
Provenance
- Source
- isc.idaho.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-21
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
4cd8af0b8c967fdde425f6fec589312ea17c92f97b4576293622ba7e37c51027
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.