Bindinglaw

ID · jury_instructions

ICJI 602

Escape – Misdemeanor

activein force · 2024-01-01 – presentas-observed

ICJI 602 ESCAPE-MISDEMEANOR

In order for the defendant to be guilty of Escape, the state must prove each of the following:

1. On or about [date]

2. in the state of Idaho

3. the defendant [name] was [charged with] [convicted of] (describe misdemeanor), a misdemeanor,

[4. and while [in lawful custody of] [confined in]

5. (describe institution or officer or person)

6. [escaped] [attempted to escape].]

[or]

[4. intentionally

5. left [the area of restriction set forth in a court order admitting a person to bail or release on a person's own recognizance with electronic or global positioning system tracking, monitoring and detention] [or] [the area of restriction set forth in a sentencing order,] except for leaving the area of restriction for the purpose of obtaining emergency medical care

6. and had previously been notified in writing by the court at [the time of setting of [bail], [release]] [or] [sentencing] of the consequences of violating the escape statute by intentionally leaving the area of restriction.]

If any of the above has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, you must find the defendant not guilty. If each of the above has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant guilty.

Comment

I.C. � 18-2506. State v. Nab, 112 Idaho 1139, 739 P.2d 438 (Ct. App. 1987).

Provenance

Source
isc.idaho.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-21
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
845f9f38485a9247876a6a9fc31fc399ecc8174d539030768afdae754ed12b5e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.