Bindinglaw

ID · jury_instructions

ICJI 542A

Grand Theft

activein force · 2024-01-01 – presentas-observed

ICJI 542A GRAND THEFT

In order for the defendant to be guilty of Grand Theft, the state must prove each of the following:

1. On or about [date]

2. in the state of Idaho

3. the defendant [name] wrongfully [took] [obtained] [or] [withheld] property [described as: (description of property)],

4. from an owner,

5. with the intent to deprive an owner of the property or to appropriate the property, and

6. [the property exceeded one thousand dollars ($1000) in value]

(Numerous other alternative enhancing factual findings omitted)

If any of the above has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, you must find the defendant not guilty of Grand Theft. If each of the above has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant guilty of Grand Theft.

Comment

I.C. � 18-2407

Effective July 1, 1999, the value of property necessary to constitute grand theft was increased from $300 to $1,000.

See I.C. � 18-3122(6) for the definition of a "financial transaction card."

If, pursuant to I.C. � 18-2407(1)(b)(8), several thefts are charged in one count as being part of a common scheme or plan with the aggregate value of the property stolen exceeding $1,000, use ICJI 554.

Revised: April 21, 2023

Provenance

Source
isc.idaho.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-21
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
794fdab34aa2fd06da67b238416f0b3d6dc3d5186b44e6fd9325d978bfe9652e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.