ID · jury_instructions
ICJI 542A
Grand Theft
ICJI 542A GRAND THEFT
In order for the defendant to be guilty of Grand Theft, the state must prove each of the following:
1. On or about [date]
2. in the state of Idaho
3. the defendant [name] wrongfully [took] [obtained] [or] [withheld] property [described as: (description of property)],
4. from an owner,
5. with the intent to deprive an owner of the property or to appropriate the property, and
6. [the property exceeded one thousand dollars ($1000) in value]
(Numerous other alternative enhancing factual findings omitted)
If any of the above has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, you must find the defendant not guilty of Grand Theft. If each of the above has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant guilty of Grand Theft.
Comment
I.C. � 18-2407
Effective July 1, 1999, the value of property necessary to constitute grand theft was increased from $300 to $1,000.
See I.C. � 18-3122(6) for the definition of a "financial transaction card."
If, pursuant to I.C. � 18-2407(1)(b)(8), several thefts are charged in one count as being part of a common scheme or plan with the aggregate value of the property stolen exceeding $1,000, use ICJI 554.
Revised: April 21, 2023
Provenance
- Source
- isc.idaho.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-21
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
794fdab34aa2fd06da67b238416f0b3d6dc3d5186b44e6fd9325d978bfe9652e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.