ID · jury_instructions
ICJI 501
Robbery
ICJI 501 ROBBERY
In order for the defendant to be guilty of Robbery, the state must prove each of the following:
1. On or about [date]
2. in the state of Idaho
3. [name of victim] had possession of personal property,
4. which the defendant [name] took from [name of victim]'s person or from [name of victim]'s immediate presence,
5. against the will of [name of victim]
6. by the intentional use of force or fear to overcome the will of [name of victim], and
7. with the intent permanently to deprive [name of victim] of the property.
If any of the above has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, you must find the defendant not guilty. If each of the above has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant guilty.
Comment
I.C. �� 18-6501 & 18-6502.
State v. Olin, 112 Idaho 673, 675, 735 P.2d 984, 986 (1987); State v. Oldham, 92 Idaho 124, 438 P.2d 275 (1968).
It is immaterial whether the defendant harbored an intent to steal when the violence or intimidation occurred if, when taking the victim's possessions, the defendant knows that his violence or threats motivated the victim's surrender of the property. State v. Belue, 127 Idaho 464, 902 P.2d 489 (Ct. App. 1995).
Provenance
- Source
- isc.idaho.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-21
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
e9966a865a9467b5be81904807fc4dd43b8015d3ee5492f73a97dcf16b766901
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.