Bindinglaw

ID · jury_instructions

ICJI 406D

Trafficking in Methamphetamine and/or Amphetamine

activein force · 2024-01-01 – presentas-observed

ICJI 406D TRAFFICKING IN METHAMPHETAMINE AND/OR AMPHETAMINE

In order for the defendant to be guilty of Trafficking in methamphetamine and/or amphetamine, the state must prove:

1. On or about [date]

2. in the state of Idaho

3. the defendant [name] [possessed] [or] [delivered] [methamphetamine] [and/or] [amphetamine],

4. the defendant knew it was [methamphetamine] [and/or] [amphetamine], and

5. [possessed] [or] [delivered] at least [] of [methamphetamine] [and/or] [amphetamine] or any mixture or substance with a detectable amount of [methamphetamine] [and/or] [amphetamine].

If any of the above has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, you must find the defendant not guilty. If each of the above has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant guilty.

Comment

I.C. � 37-2732B(a)(4).

If the defendant is charged with "second offense" drug trafficking, IC � 37-2732B(a)(7), that issue should be presented in a bifurcated proceeding as provided in ICJI 1601.

It was error for the verdict form, in combination with jury instruction for manufacturing, to fail to require a finding by the jury that the manufacturing was done knowingly. State v. Palmer, 138 Idaho 931, 71 P.3d 439 (Ct. App. 2003).

Provenance

Source
isc.idaho.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-21
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
e2f1509de0fdfffc917a1f153a4cfbab1539e7f4b5b556151d4fe547e5a54c53
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.