Bindinglaw

ID · jury_instructions

ICJI 320

Use of Witness’ Prior Consistent Statements

activein force · 2024-01-01 – presentas-observed

ICJI 320 USE OF WITNESS' PRIOR CONSISTENT STATEMENTS

testified in the (state's) (defense) case during the trial. You will recall that it was brought out that before this trial this witness made statements which were the same as, or similar to, what the witness said here in the courtroom. These earlier statements were brought to your attention to help you decide whether you believe _______ 's testimony.

Comment

The committee recommends that this instruction be given immediately following the witness' testimony upon request made by the party opposing the impeachment. Without such a request, it may be given at the close of the evidence.

Provenance

Source
isc.idaho.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-21
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
d42e3d100416456df096bcd3940e0590cf0765b74a7f8adebe0d6ac0b87372f6
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.