ID · jury_instructions
ICJI 231
Substitution of Juror After Deliberations Begin
ICJI 231 SUBSTITUTION OF JUROR AFTER DELIBERATIONS BEGIN
One of your number has been excused and replaced with an alternate juror.
The state and the defendant each have a right to a verdict reached only after full participation of the [twelve] [six] jurors who ultimately return the verdict.
This right may be assured in this case only if the jury begins its deliberations again from the beginning.
You are therefore instructed to set aside and disregard all past deliberations and begin deliberating anew. This means that each remaining original juror must set aside and disregard the earlier deliberations as if they had not taken place.
You shall now retire for your deliberations in accordance with all the instructions previously given.
Provenance
- Source
- isc.idaho.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-21
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
8e9bff84edf82ade5e6cf167a3bf41d44da0bdb2e8a6e3d057be1b44f40b4af7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.