ID · jury_instructions
ICJI 1712
Murder for Remuneration
ICJI 1712 Murder for Remuneration
You have been instructed that the State has alleged the statutory aggravating circumstance that the murder was committed for remuneration or the promise of remuneration or the defendant employed another to commit the murder for remuneration or the promise of remuneration. In order to find the defendant guilty of this statutory aggravating circumstance, you must unanimously find, beyond a reasonable doubt, remuneration was a motive, reason, or impetus for the murder and not merely the result of the murder. Remuneration means payment or compensation.
Comment
This instruction should be given if the State alleges the murder for remuneration statutory aggravator set forth in I. C. § 19-2515(9)(d).
Provenance
- Source
- isc.idaho.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-21
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
bc4afa28bb570544fc10c970a298d1e4f1513575e0c3028805e2ccfb16e95d50
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.