Bindinglaw

ID · jury_instructions

ICJI 1601

Persistent Violator

activein force · 2024-01-01 – presentas-observed

ICJI 1601 PERSISTENT VIOLATOR

Having found the defendant guilty of _______ , you must next consider whether the defendant has been convicted on [at least] two prior occasions of felony offenses.

The state alleges the defendant has prior convictions as follows:

1. On or about the _______ day of _______ , 200 ____ , the defendant was convicted of _______ , and

2. On or about the ____ day of _______ , 200 ____ , the defendant was convicted of _______ [.] [and]

[3. (Add any other alleged prior convictions).]

The existence of a prior conviction must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt and your decision must be unanimous.

Comment

State v. Johnson, 86 Idaho 51, 383 P2d 326 (1963), held that a persistent violator charge should be stated in a two-part information. The first part should state the particular offense with which the defendant is charged, and be signed at the end of the page by the prosecutor. The second part, or page, should allege former convictions, and be separable from the first part. It should be signed separately by the prosecutor. The entire information should be read to the accused at arraignment. However, when the jury is informed of the charge only the first part is read, then, after, and depending upon the verdict on part one, the second part is read, and the jury deliberates further.

Additional instruction on persistent violator and suitable verdict forms -- for findings by the jury on each alleged prior conviction -- should be given upon sending the jury back to deliberate further.

Provenance

Source
isc.idaho.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-21
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
1af25bb2ddfa9970128de26792377c05f9719815d9b584818126879022c3ab9d
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.