ID · jury_instructions
ICJI 1220
Hazing
ICJI 1220 HAZING
In order for the defendant to be guilty of Hazing, the state must prove each of the following:
1. On or about [date]
2. in the state of Idaho
3. the defendant [name], while a member of a [fraternity,] [sorority,] [or] [a living or social organization organized or operating on or near a college or university campus for purposes of participating in student activity,]
4. intentionally,
5. [hazed] [or] [conspired to haze] [name of victim],
6. a member, potential member or person pledged to be a member of the organization,
7. the activity constituting hazing was a condition or precondition of attaining membership, status, or any office in the organization, and
8. did not take place as part of the curricular activities or athletic team activities of or within the college or university.
If any of the above has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, you must find the defendant not guilty. If each of the above has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant guilty.
Comment
I.C. � 18-917.
Provenance
- Source
- isc.idaho.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-21
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
68014d66c3ad5def245322c2fd79ddaf80c49bc89303fc04dbc3147f357448db
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.