Bindinglaw

ID · jury_instructions

ICJI 103

Reasonable Doubt

activein force · 2024-01-01 – presentas-observed

ICJI 103 REASONABLE DOUBT

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE-REASONABLE DOUBT

Under our law and system of justice, the defendant is presumed to be innocent. The presumption of innocence means two things.

First, the State has the burden of proving the defendant guilty. The State has that burden throughout the trial. The defendant is never required to prove [his] [her] innocence, nor does the defendant ever have to produce any evidence at all.

Second, the State must prove the alleged crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is proof that leaves you firmly convinced the defendant is guilty. It is not required that the State prove the defendant's guilt beyond all possible doubt.

A reasonable doubt is a doubt based upon reason and common sense and is not based purely on speculation. It may arise from a careful and impartial consideration of all the evidence, or from lack of evidence.

If after a careful and impartial consideration of all the evidence, you are not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty, it is your duty to find the defendant not guilty. On the other hand, if after a careful and impartial consideration of all the evidence, you are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty, it is your duty to find the defendant guilty.

Provenance

Source
isc.idaho.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-21
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
2b7943be9bc4e83dc3d195bfad857d7903bf76d62515c1c762d2545c05e1821a
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.