ID · jury_instructions
ICJI 1024
DWP Special Verdict Instruction – Enhancement
ICJI 1024 DWP SPECIAL VERDICT INSTRUCTION-ENHANCEMENT
In this portion of the case you will return a verdict, consisting of a [series of] question(s) you should answer. Since the explanations on the form which you will have are part of my instructions to you, I will read the body of the verdict form to you.
"We, the Jury, duly impaneled and sworn to try the above entitled action, unanimously answer the question(s) submitted to us in this verdict as follows:
QUESTION NO. 1: Within the past five (5) years [did the defendant plead guilty to] [or] [was the defendant found guilty of] a violation of IC � 18-8001, Driving without Privileges, in [name of county], Idaho, Case No. ?
ANSWER: YES NO _______
[QUESTION NO. 2: Within the past five (5) years [did the defendant plead guilty to] [or] [was the defendant found guilty of] a violation of IC � 18-8001, Driving without Privileges, in [name of county], Idaho, Case No. ?
ANSWER: YES NO]"
Once you have answered the questions, your presiding juror should date and sign the verdict form and advise the bailiff that you have reached a verdict.
Provenance
- Source
- isc.idaho.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-21
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
68b1350270aa9881d80e3fceb5eb9806a235c8b968541a60e7a8cb63ce98e076
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.